Computational model of a tiny worm neural activity highlights neurons that could serve as the basis of future experiments
A recent study out of the Complexity Science Hub (CSH) Vienna paves the way to a deeper insight into the complexity of the human brain, one of the largest and most sophisticated organs in the human body. The study – which develops a mathematical and computational framework for analysing neural activity in C. elegans, a tiny worm that has been used as a model organism to study neural activity – was published in the journal PLoS Computational Biology.
The microscopic organism, consisting of just 1.000 cells – 300 of which are neurons –, has been precisely mapped, but the role of neurons in controlling behavior remains controversial, states CSH PostDoc Edward Lee, the first author of the paper.
Based on recent advances in measuring neurons in live worms, the new study proposes a way to unmask the roles of neurons by using more natural perturbations.
“In the work, we try to be more holistic, in the sense that we take all the data and try to understand which sets of neurons belong together and are associated with a particular behavior,” says Eddie. “In other words, if I want the worm to turn left, I don’t care about one particular neuron, I probably care about multiple different neurons.”
Experimenting with a simple neural system
Eddie and his team study the worm as an example since its simple neural system provides a solid basis for understanding the mechanisms of the brains of higher animals, such as humans. The researchers developed a mathematical model for collective neural activity. They then conducted an in silico experiment with small neural perturbations that may trigger behavioral responses and can be replicated in a scientific trial.
“The idea is that if you can, in a model, push around each of the neurons in different ways, you can measure how the behavior changes. And if the behavior changes, for example, more strongly when two neurons are pushed together, then somehow these two neurons form a set and are not independent one from the other”, explains Eddie.
Future research in neuroscience
Eddie says the results point to interesting neurons that can be used as a starting point for neuroscientific research. The study, which analyzed around 50 neurons in the C. elegans nervous system, suggests there are a handful of “pivotal” neurons that are associated with a large response in the statistics. “It might be a good idea to look at those neurons,” he points out.
“Knowing that a neuron is implicated in a specific behavior doesn’t tell you what it does. Some of the experimental results don’t indicate a neuron was necessarily involved in a behavior in an important way, for instance”, says Eddie. When multiple neurons are involved with a particular behavior, it may be interesting to investigate how they work together or against each other.
The paper poses several new hypotheses regarding how behavioral control might be centralized in particular neural cells. “We’re proposing a theoretical framework for asking these questions and making predictions,” Eddie concludes, adding he hopes experiments will answer them in the coming years.
The study “Discovering sparse control strategies in neural activity” by Edward D. Lee, Xiaowen Chen and Bryan C. Daniels appeared in PLoS Computational Biology.