Yes we can — STEM is also for women


Oct 13, 2022

CSH physicist Fariba Karimi and her team analyzed the claims made by a ‘sexist’ senior scientist – who said that women were less able at physics than men.

 

The year was 2018 and physicist Fariba Karimi remembers feeling appalled and disgusted by the remarks made by a prominent male scientist during a presentation at Cern, the European nuclear research center in Geneva. “It was just unbelievable,” recalls Fariba, who leads a team in computational social science at the Complexity Science Hub Vienna (CSH).

 

During a Cern workshop on gender equality, a professor of Pisa University said physics was “invented and built by men” and claimed that male scientists produced better research than female researchers.

 

The controversy spurred Fariba, who has long been intrigued with the origins of gender disparities in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) fields, to design a study to discover why women are discriminated against in physics.

 

Her findings are published in the new issue of the journal Communications Physics.

 

First-mover advantage

 

The study, which drew on a unique dataset provided by the American Physical Society, confirmed that women are still largely underrepresented in this field. However, the results indicate that, although papers written by women tend to have lower visibility, the gender gap is the result of men enjoying a first-mover advantage in physics.

 

“This means that the participation of men in physics has historically been disproportionately higher than that of women. It also means that the entry barrier for women into physics was higher – due to sexism and societal expectations of women – and therefore they could not enter the physics community as early as men,” explains Fariba.

 

“At a macro level, this structural barrier resulted in a physics community with more senior privileged white men, thus creating an illusion that physics is not for women,” adds the CSH researcher.

 

Recognition for similar work

 

The dataset was composed of more than 541,000 scholarly articles published between 1893 to 2010, and included article metadata, author information, and citations. Using a technique that combines name and image recognition, the researchers inferred the gender of the primary authors of papers: 9,947 women and 60,886 men.

 

“In the study, rather than just comparing men and women in physics in terms of publications and citations, I wanted to see whether they receive different recognition for similar work published around the same time,” points out the CSH’s team leader.

 

Consequently, the team selected pairs of papers on similar topics written by men and women primary authors. Then, they computed the difference in the number of citations each paper received. “The main goal was to compare pairs of similar papers in an unbiased fashion,” explains Hyunsik Kong, co-author of the study.

 

By comparing “apples to apples,” the researchers came upon a disparity in citations. “It’s not huge, but it’s definitely there”, observes Samuel Martin-Gutierrez, co-author of the paper and a postdoc at CSH. “And we found that the temporal aspect of scientific production was very important to explain this citation disparity.”

 

Men still have the edge over women

 

According to the analysis, whoever published first, regardless of gender, tended to get most of the attention of the scientific community. “This explains part of this disparity, but not all. There are differences in how men and women get the first-mover advantage and men still have the edge over women,” says Samuel.

 

In other words, this means that men tended to publish first more often than women. Furthermore, when men published first, they still gained an advantage over women. “A male author gets more citations when he publishes first compared to a female author,” points out Samuel.

 

When the CSH team adjusted the time of publication, there were no statistically significant differences in citations of men and women. “The results combined suggest that the overall disparity in the citation network is a result of cumulative advantages and the first-mover effect that men have in physics,” conclude the scientists.

 

“From a broader perspective, the entry barriers for women due to historical disadvantages and sexism create a so-called ‘structural inequality’ or what sociologists call ‘racism without racists’. As a result, structural inequality continues to affect women’s participation for generations to come, and it should be addressed through appropriate interventions,” highlights Fariba.

 

The study “Influence of the first-mover advantage on the gender disparities in physics citations,” by Hyunsik Kong, Samuel Martin-Gutierrez, and Fariba Karimi, was published in Communications Physics (2022) 5:243.


Press

Obesity increases the chances of developing mental disorders for all age groups


News Medical, May 30, 2023

News

May 31, 2023

Forensic analysis shows signs of election fraud in Turkey

Press

End Times by Peter Turchin review – can we predict the collapse of societies?


The Guardian, May 28, 2023

Press

Wie Medikamente durch die Welt reisen


NEWS, May 31, 2023

Publication

C. Deischinger, E. Dervic, S. Nopp, M. Kaleta, P. Klimek, A. Kautzky-Willer

Diabetes mellitus is associated with a higher relative risk for venous thromboembolism in females than in males

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2022) 36471550

Research News

May 30, 2023

Obesity increases risk of mental disorders throughout life

Event

CSH Talk by François Lafond "Firm-level production networks: what do we (really) know?"


Jun 07, 2023 | 15:0016:00

Complexity Science Hub Vienna

Publication

A. Nerpel, et al.

SARS-ANI: a global open access dataset of reported SARS-CoV-2 events in animals

Scientific Data 9 (438) (2022)

People

May 30, 2023

Meet Sachin Rawat

Publication

V.D.P. Servedio, M. R. Ferreira, N. Reisz, R. Costas, S. Thurner

Scale-free growth in regional scientific capacity building explains long-term scientific dominance

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 167 (2023) 113020

Event

CSH Talk by Thomas Choi "Supply Networks: Dyads, Triads, Tetrads, and Beyond"


Jun 06, 2023 | 15:0016:00

Complexity Science Hub Vienna

News

May 31, 2023

Forensic analysis shows signs of election fraud in Turkey

People

May 30, 2023

Meet Sachin Rawat

Research News

May 30, 2023

Obesity increases risk of mental disorders throughout life

News

May 25, 2023

Quotas alone will not solve the problem

Spotlight

May 17, 2023

Complexity Research for Digital Humanism

People

May 12, 2023

Peter Turchin introduces his new book

Research News

May 2, 2023

Scientists create high-resolution poverty maps using big data

News

Apr 26, 2023

BEYOND COLLECTIVE STUPIDITY

Spotlight

Apr 21, 2023

How does a region become a center for innovation?

Spotlight

Apr 14, 2023

Are cars our kings?

Press

End Times by Peter Turchin review – can we predict the collapse of societies?


The Guardian, May 28, 2023

Press

Obesity increases the chances of developing mental disorders for all age groups


News Medical, May 30, 2023

Press

Wie Medikamente durch die Welt reisen


NEWS, May 31, 2023

Press

Kritik an EU-Chatkontrolle


Ö1 | Digital.leben, May 11, 2023

Press

Treibjagd im Darknet: Neue Technologien für Cyber-Ermittler


Salzburger Nachrichten, May 16, 2023

Press

„Die Älteren halten zu Erdogan, die jüngere Generation hat andere Sorgen“


Cicero, May 9, 2023

Press

Stablecoin Destabilization - why should we care?


Forbes, Apr 27, 2023

Press

„Wir sind nicht so einfach zu manipulieren“ [feat. Hannah Metzler]


Kurier, Apr 29, 2023

Press

Die manchmal fatale Lust, alles selbst zu recherchieren [feat. Mirta Galesic & Henrik Olsson]


Die Presse, Apr 14, 2023

Press

La scienza ha creato una nuova classificazione delle aperture degli scacchi [ital | feat. Vito Servedio & Giordano De Marzo]


WIRED, Apr 10, 2023

Publication

R. Prieto-Curiel, J. E. Patino, B. Anderson

Scaling of the morphology of African cities

PNAS 120 (9) (2023) e2214254120

Publication

A. Di Natale, D. Garcia

LEXpander: applying colexification networks to automated lexicon expansion

Behaviour Research Methods (2023)

Publication

V.D.P. Servedio, M. R. Ferreira, N. Reisz, R. Costas, S. Thurner

Scale-free growth in regional scientific capacity building explains long-term scientific dominance

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 167 (2023) 113020

Publication

C. Deischinger, E. Dervic, S. Nopp, M. Kaleta, P. Klimek, A. Kautzky-Willer

Diabetes mellitus is associated with a higher relative risk for venous thromboembolism in females than in males

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2022) 36471550

Publication

A. Nerpel, et al.

SARS-ANI: a global open access dataset of reported SARS-CoV-2 events in animals

Scientific Data 9 (438) (2022)

Publication

E. D. Lee, X. Chen, B. C. Daniels

Discovering sparse control strategies in neural activity

PLoS Computational Biology (May 27) (2022)

Publication

H. Kong, S. Martin-Gutierrez, F. Karimi

Influence of the first-mover advantage on the gender disparities in physics citations

Communications Physics 5 (243) (2022)

Publication

T.M. Pham, J. Korbel, R. Hanel, S. Thurner

Empirical social triad statistics can be explained with dyadic homophylic interactions

PNAS 119 (2022) e2121103119

Publication

G. De Marzo, V.D.P. Servedio

Quantifying the complexity and similarity of chess openings using online chess community data

Scientific Reports 13 (2023) 5327

Publication

D. R. Lo Sardo, S. Thurner, et al.

Systematic population-wide ecological analysis of regional variability in disease prevalence

Heliyon 9(4) (2023) e15377

Publication

J. Wachs

Digital traces of brain drain: developers during the Russian invasion of Ukraine

EPJ Data Science 12 (2023) 14

Publication

D. Diodato, R. Hausmann, F. Neffke

The impact of return migration on employment and wages in Mexican cities

Journal of Urban Economics 135 (2023) 103557

Event

CSH Talk by Thomas Choi "Supply Networks: Dyads, Triads, Tetrads, and Beyond"


Jun 06, 2023 | 15:0016:00

Complexity Science Hub Vienna

Event

CSH Workshop: "Firm-level supply network data for policy making"


Jun 05, 2023 | 8:00Jun 06, 2023 | 17:00

Complexity Science Hub Vienna

Event

CSH Talk by François Lafond "Firm-level production networks: what do we (really) know?"


Jun 07, 2023 | 15:0016:00

Complexity Science Hub Vienna